External Actors Finance, Arm Proxy Groups To Fuel Conflict In Africa — Obasanjo 

 

By Rotela Oguns

 

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has identified factors militating against sustainable peace in the continent of Africa.

 

Obasanjo noted that chief of the factors is the financing and arming of proxy groups by external actors describing it as one of the “greatest obstacles” to sustainable peace in Africa.

 

The former president spoke on Thursday during the third Mashariki cooperation conference held in Diani, Kwale County, Kenya.

 

The conference’s theme was “Emerging geopolitical dynamics and Africa’s security architecture.”

 

 

Speaking on why many African nations have yet to find lasting solution to the challenge of insecurity, Obasanjo stated that most nations on the continent have been addressing the issue by adopting cosmetic approach.

 

He stated that he came to this conclusion after decades of  direct intervention in African security and conflict resolution, saying that “without a credible political process is at best a pause in fighting and at worst a prolongation of it.”

 

Citing the trend of coups in the Sahel region, Obasanjo said African institutions have a responsibility to speak the truth when a leader uses the “language of anti-colonialism and sovereignty as a shield for the systematic destruction of his own people’s livelihoods and rights.”

 

The former president also emphasized the significance of intelligence gathering and collaboration in tackling insecurity across Africa

 

 

He added  that warning signs were always visible before the first shot was fired.

 

The former president said, “In nearly every conflict I have helped to mediate, the warning signs were visible months or years before the first shot was fired,” he said.

 

“Ethnic tensions were being deliberately inflamed. Electoral processes were being manipulated. Youth were being recruited into militias. Economic marginalisation was deepening.

 

“Regional neighbours were beginning to take sides. The information existed. What was missing was the institutional will to act on it, to share it across borders and to take the political risks that early intervention requires.

 

 

 

He continued, “The intelligence community in Africa must become more explicitly and systematically focused on early warning and early action by regional leaders.

 

“The continental early warning system of the African Union exists for precisely this purpose. It must be better resourced, better staffed and, above all, better connected to decision-makers who are prepared to act on what it tells them.

 

“The third conclusion is that the financing and arming of proxy forces by external actors is one of the greatest obstacles to durable peace in Africa, and that intelligence services have a particular responsibility to expose it.

 

“In the DRC, Rwandan and Ugandan support for armed groups was documented over the years by UN panel of experts reports.

 

“In Sudan, external actors provided material and political support to parties that had no incentive to reach a settlement as long as that support continued.

 

“In Libya, since the fall of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, a bewildering array of external states, including the UAE, Turkey, Egypt, Russia and several European governments, have poured weapons and fighters into a conflict that they have simultaneously claimed to want to resolve. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.

 

 

“African intelligence services that can accurately map these external interventions and bring that mapping to the attention of the African Union and the UN security council perform a service not only to the countries directly concerned but to the entire project of African peace.”

 

A